<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Guillaume&#039;s blog &#187; barcampbankdallas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lebleu.org/blog/tags/barcampbankdallas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lebleu.org/blog</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the future of money</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2015 08:19:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.42</generator>
	<item>
		<title>BarCampBankDallas, Whuffie and open Banking Web APIs</title>
		<link>http://lebleu.org/blog/2008/06/25/barcampbankdallas-whuffie-and-open-banking-web-apis/</link>
		<comments>http://lebleu.org/blog/2008/06/25/barcampbankdallas-whuffie-and-open-banking-web-apis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guillaume Lebleu]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[api]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barcampbank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barcampbankdallas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reputation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whuffie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lebleu.org/blog/2008/06/25/barcampbankdallas-whuffie-and-open-banking-web-apis/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wasn&#8217;t able to attend BankCampBankDallas, but Charlie over at Open Source CU wrote a nice report highlighting some of the concepts that were discussed during the camp: Incorporating online reputation into financial reputation: &#8220;why can’t [FIs] hook into LinkedIn and view a person’s Recommendations and process that into their credit score&#8221; Opening a FI&#8217;s &#8230; <a href="http://lebleu.org/blog/2008/06/25/barcampbankdallas-whuffie-and-open-banking-web-apis/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">BarCampBankDallas, Whuffie and open Banking Web APIs</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t able to attend <a href="BarCampBankDallas">BankCampBankDallas</a>, but Charlie over at <a href="http://www.opensourcecu.com">Open Source CU</a> wrote <a href="http://www.opensourcecu.com/">a nice report</a> highlighting some of the concepts that were discussed during the camp:</p>
<ul>
<li>Incorporating online reputation into financial reputation: &#8220;why can’t [FIs] hook into LinkedIn and view a person’s Recommendations and process that into their credit score&#8221;</li>
<li>Opening a FI&#8217;s APIs to the creativity of their customers and 3rd party developers: &#8220;could there ever be a day where an existing financial institution could let people hook into it and meaningfully tailor the infrastructure and product to their own needs?&#8221;</li>
</ul>
<p>I think exploring the links between online reputation and financial reputation is very interesting indeed. I think leveraging public social data is a great way for banks to reduce the risk of payment default on people with less than perfect credit. I&#8217;ve talked about this before, particularly in the context of peer-to-peer lending: in <a href="http://lebleu.org/blog/2008/05/19/the-problem-with-banking-innovation-and-how-to-fix-it/">the problem with banking innovation&#8230;</a>, I explained how a loan where some of the people lending money are family members offers a different and more attractive risk profile than someone&#8217;s lending money from people they don&#8217;t know (and don&#8217;t care) about (especially when you have a huge securitization food chain). I had never thought that such data could eventually actually be part of the FICO score, and that I think that will take A LOT of time. Here is my guess at how things will evolve: I think that Experian-like services computing someone&#8217;s overall reputation (see <a href="http://lebleu.org/blog/2008/06/23/how-to-compute-someones-whuffie/">how to compute someone&#8217;s whuffie</a>) will develop, and as they become established brands, may end up as an input to FICO scores. Anyway, I do think FIs are fundamentally social intermediaries and can&#8217;t afford to ignore the publicly available social data. I think there is a great opportunity, especially at credit intermediaries whose goal is the benefit of the community (credit unions), to re-socialize credit relationships.</p>
<p>Regarding the opening of Banking Web APIs, I think also that this is a great way for FIs to smartsource innovation while ensuring the highest level of security standards. In <a href="http://lebleu.org/blog/2008/05/19/the-problem-with-banking-innovation-and-how-to-fix-it/">the problem with banking innovation&#8230;</a>, I suggested at the very end that one way to smartsource innovation could be to &#8220;do what Apple or Facebook do: expose some of this information via easy-to-use APIs in a way that is more secure than their startup competitors. Then, allocate a VC fund to fund startups using this API (which is equivalent to buy an option to invest more/buy out the most promising ventures later).&#8221;</p>
<p>So, I&#8217;m glad to see that these highlighted concepts are inline with some of my own ideas and probably with many other people. I really hope I can make it to the next BarCampBank near San Francisco.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lebleu.org/blog/2008/06/25/barcampbankdallas-whuffie-and-open-banking-web-apis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
